General

Design-Bid-Build

Also known as: DBB, Traditional Delivery

The traditional project delivery method where the owner contracts the architect first, then bids the completed drawings to GCs.

Design-bid-build is the most common project delivery method in commercial and residential construction. The owner hires the architect to develop drawings and specifications. After design is complete (or near complete), the owner solicits competitive bids from GCs based on the finished documents. The lowest qualified bid typically wins, and that GC executes a fixed-price contract for the work as drawn.

DBB is preferred when the owner wants maximum price competition and has the time to wait through full design before construction starts. The trade-off: GCs have no input on constructability during design, change orders are common when the drawings have errors, and the schedule is sequential rather than overlapping. Compared to design-build and CMAR, DBB usually produces the lowest hard cost but the longest total project duration and the most adversarial owner-contractor relationship.

Frequently asked questions

When is design-bid-build the right delivery method?+

When the owner has time for sequential design and bidding, when scope is well-understood, and when maximum price competition matters more than speed. Public projects often use DBB by statute.

What are the downsides of design-bid-build?+

No constructability input from the GC during design, longer total project schedule, more change orders when drawings have errors, and a more adversarial owner-contractor relationship since the GC arrives only after design is complete.

How does design-bid-build compare to design-build?+

DBB separates design from construction; design-build wraps both under one contract. DBB usually produces the lowest hard cost; design-build usually produces the fastest schedule and single-point accountability.

Related terms