General

Integrated Project Delivery

Also known as: IPD

A delivery method where owner, designer, and contractor share a single multi-party contract with shared risk and reward.

Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) puts the owner, architect, and general contractor under a single multi-party agreement with shared financial risk and reward. The team agrees on a target cost. If the team beats the target, savings are shared. If the team exceeds the target, losses are also shared (often capped at the design and contracting fees). The structure aligns incentives across parties that traditional delivery puts in adversarial positions.

IPD requires high trust, mature partners, and contracts the parties have actually read. It works best on complex projects with high coordination demands (hospitals, advanced manufacturing) where the cost of misalignment is large. It does not work on commodity work where the owner just wants the lowest price. Tools that support IPD include: integrated BIM models, collocated project teams, weekly cross-discipline coordination meetings, and open-book accounting visible to all parties.

Frequently asked questions

How does IPD differ from CMAR or design-build?+

CMAR has separate owner-designer and owner-CM contracts; the CM holds construction risk only. Design-build wraps design and construction under one entity but the owner is still external. IPD puts owner, designer, and contractor in a single multi-party contract with shared risk and reward.

When is IPD the right delivery method?+

On highly complex projects (hospitals, advanced manufacturing) where coordination matters more than price competition, where the parties have worked together before or have explicit alignment skill, and where the owner is willing to negotiate target cost rather than competitively bid.

Why isn't IPD more common?+

It requires trust, mature partners, sophisticated owners, and lawyers willing to write multi-party contracts. Most projects default to DBB or design-build because they are simpler to procure. IPD remains a small fraction of overall construction volume despite the alignment benefits.

Related terms