Codes & Permits

Plan Review

The AHJ's examination of construction drawings for code compliance before issuing a permit.

Plan review is the formal examination of construction drawings by the AHJ for compliance with the building code, energy code, fire code, accessibility code, and any local ordinances. Plan reviewers issue comments (deficiencies that must be corrected before permit issuance), and the design team responds with revised drawings or written explanations. The cycle repeats until the reviewer is satisfied, then the permit issues. Major commercial projects often go through two to four comment cycles.

Plan-review timelines vary widely: same-day over-the-counter for simple work, 1 to 3 weeks for residential additions, 4 to 16 weeks for new commercial construction, and longer in busy jurisdictions. Comment-cycle delays compound: a 4-week initial review plus three 2-week comment cycles equals 10 weeks of permit limbo. Best practice: pre-application meetings with the AHJ to surface major issues before formal submission, complete drawing sets that address common comment topics up front, and assigning a single point of contact for the comment cycle so responses are coordinated.

Frequently asked questions

How long does plan review take?+

Same-day for simple work. 1 to 3 weeks for residential additions. 4 to 16 weeks for new commercial. Major commercial projects with multiple comment cycles can run 12 to 24 weeks total. Always confirm current AHJ timelines before bidding the project schedule.

How do contractors shorten plan review?+

Pre-application meetings with the AHJ to identify major issues early. Complete and well-organized drawing sets that address common comments up front. A single point of contact for comment-cycle responses. Expedited review programs (additional fees, 1 to 2 week turnaround) where available.

What are typical plan review comments?+

Egress capacity calculations, fire-rated assemblies and penetrations, energy code envelope compliance, accessibility (ADA) details, structural connection details, MEP equipment locations and clearances, and code-section citations missing from the drawings. The same comment categories recur across most projects.

Related terms